ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	444% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GE
Memory	14.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '22 at 05:59
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 118 2-Core 232 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 627 64% 515 Pts	64-Core 672 42% 672 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 1A4E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 39.8 Parallax 37.9 32% 38.9 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 26.6 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1A4E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1029 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.86% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 8.2 Parallax 7.4 5% 7.23 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 10.8 8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.86% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 128GB 891 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 31 21 31 33 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	444% Outstanding	Read 5,212 Write 42.7 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 31 278% 1,340 MB/s	4K Read 578 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 5.5 884% 195 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 444% Great: 112%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 735GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 122 122 122 122 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 77.1 Write 117 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 120 70% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.6 177% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-047.A00G 24GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 19.7 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 23.5 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GE Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	24x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	16x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	15x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	5x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	3x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 24GBSamsungBench 59%, 50 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback