Lenovo 20244

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20244  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131210
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 00:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 151
57% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 387
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3912) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.9
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$54
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 133 95 121 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 411
Write 340
Mixed 226
SusWrite 140
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 10.5
51% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 31.5
DQ Mixed 30.6
34% 60 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-143.A00LF HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.6% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20244 Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20244

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback