Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 189 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 357 47% 355 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0152) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.47% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.47% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900615 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 162 87 90 85 90 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.6% Above average	Read 252 Write 233 Mixed 215 SusWrite 123 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 29.3 104% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 160 130% 185 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 M378B5773CH0-CK0 4GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 17.5 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
MX500 500GBCrucial $40Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	8x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	7x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	11x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	9x
CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GBCrucialBench 30%, 12,839 samples	6x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325