Asus Q505UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus Q505UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q505UAR
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190503
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 20:36
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 184
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 94.5
26% 171 Pts
64-Core 72.3
4% 72.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 32.3
30% 36.1 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 30.7
27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 353 139 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 422
Write 162
Mixed 320
SusWrite 178
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 35.6
138% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 213
179% 258 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 96%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 256GB
188GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 318 312 309 310 330 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 325
Write 302
Mixed 280
SusWrite 309
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 17.6
69% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 36.2
55% 104 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 8R 6G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 47% 34 177 101 60 24" 1920 1080 GSM58C5 E2442
History: Score 38: 4R 4G 6B | Score 60: 8R 6G 2B
Typical Q505UAR Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q505UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback