Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 53.4 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 175 58% 105 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 648 58% 491 Pts	64-Core 1,594 99% 1,594 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 39.2 Reflection 42 Parallax 37.5 32% 39.6 fps	MRender 50.8 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 39.6 34% 42.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUC10909 CLAR900 900GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 741GB free (System drive) Firmware: C600 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 154 161 148 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 171 Mixed 96 SusWrite 159 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 100%
Seagate DKS2C-H2R0SS 2TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: 5C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 41 41 42 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 125 Write 41.8 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 41.3 46% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 50%
General UDisk 64GB 461 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 51GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 10 11 7.8 11 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	5.1% Terrible	Read 15 Write 4.2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 9.5 10% 8.68 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.1% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NL-CG M393B1K70DH0-YK0 Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NL... 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.7% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 31.7 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.3 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16