Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '22 at 23:46
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 250
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 683
70% 565 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2835 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 187
Parallax 172
135% 175 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 174
Splatting 126
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 250GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 466
Mixed 390
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 57.6
195% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 126%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
903GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2094 2091 2093 2071 2090 2097 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 1,607
Write 2,116
Mixed 1771
SusWrite 2,089
430% 1,896 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 79.6
271% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 960
722% 970 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 319%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
10GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 473
Mixed 445
105% 471 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 57.8
193% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
184GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 114 112 113 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 81.4
Write 85.5
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 113
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
242GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 94 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 85.6
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 92.2
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 67%
USB Reader 16GB
11GB free, PID 2240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.3
11% 9.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 2.2
94% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback