Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X409JB
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210812
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '22 at 08:17
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 119 2-Core 184 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 384 42% 332 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX110 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 180F) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 3 Parallax 7.8 6% 6.07 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 8.2 Splatting 8.1 7% 9.3 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 820 175 67 81 66 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 853 Write 906 Mixed 766 SusWrite 218 154% 686 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 63.5 224% 89.8 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 582 DQ Mixed 398 314% 426 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 185%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB 54,777 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	72.8% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 21.1 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 22.1 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JB_A409JB

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	26x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	18x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	33x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	11x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	4x
128GB SSD 128GBLexarBench 67%, 8,135 samples	4x
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 70 samples	3x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	11x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	8x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 0B79 8GBSamsungBench 65%, 6 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16