Oegstone DQ77CP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemOegstone DQ77CP  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 22:47
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 169
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 296
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 67
Parallax 58.6
55% 64.5 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 58.8
Splatting 58.6
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA240CV10001 240GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STWSH012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 366 387 388 394 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 263
Write 14.7
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 302
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 8.6
55% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 91%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
428GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 25 24 24 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 19.9
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 23.4
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ77CP Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Oegstone DQ77CP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback