Medion MS-7848

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion MS-7848  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime21 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 19:02
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 191
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 566
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
MSI(1462 284B) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 442.80
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 32.1
18% 26.6 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 25.3
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kuijia DK500/120G 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1102A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 377 391 405 388 386 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 455
Write 397
Mixed 374
SusWrite 373
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 20.8
121% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 29.2
75% 153 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7848 Builds (Compare 690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7848

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback