Gigabyte GA-G7 GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive379% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G7 GD  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 10:18
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 72.5
1-Core 161
2-Core 322
97% 185 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 914
95% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Clevo(1558 5017) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6275
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.9% Good
Lighting 85.9
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 70.8
70% 77.7 fps
MRender 72.9
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 59.1
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA6-8D512 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ER23401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2723 990 1003 995 1018 1005 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 3,062
Write 1,514
Mixed 2,838
SusWrite 1289
486% 2176 MB/s
4K Read 80.4
4K Write 243
4K Mixed 116
400% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,330
DQ Write 1,078
DQ Mixed 1,230
914% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 379%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 32.5
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 19.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G7 GD Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G7 GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback