Dynabook SATELLITE PRO A50-J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDynabook SATELLITE PRO A50-J  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook A0113/0001
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210818
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 13:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 233
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 490
55% 430 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(3100 0009) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.86% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 13.3
9% 11.7 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 8.6
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEJA0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 501 491 548 392 391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 850
Mixed 825
SusWrite 464
165% 731 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 52.5
175% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 466
339% 454 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 134%
Great: 196%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 14.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 13.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE PRO A50-J Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO A50-J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback