Medion Erazer X7841 MD99556

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion Erazer X7841 MD99556  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RS-GM
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 13:39
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 180
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 514
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 6B02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 63.3
50% 66.4 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 66
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 461
Mixed 380
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 53.6
179% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 344
261% 351 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
OCZ Vector 150 120GB-$89
73GB free
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 399 416 419 419 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 418
Mixed 339
SusWrite 398
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 34.6
130% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 298
228% 307 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
238GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 45 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 44.3
Write 42.1
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 45.5
29% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 28.5
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X7841 MD99556 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7841 MD99556

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback