Medion Erazer X7841 MD99556

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion Erazer X7841 MD99556  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RS-GM
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 09:20
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 572
65% 506 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 6B02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 60.1
48% 63.1 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 63.6
52% 63.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 292 249 101 103 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 477
Mixed 382
SusWrite 187
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 55.7
190% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 357
270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 116%
OCZ Vector 150 120GB-$89
5GB free
Firmware: 1.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 464
Write 415
Mixed 335
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 35.6
138% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 304
236% 321 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
281GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 70 71 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 46
Write 44.1
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 69.1
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 26.2
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 27.7
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X7841 MD99556 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7841 MD99556

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback