Vestel 14MB24A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVestel 14MB24A  (all builds)
MotherboardVESTEL 14MB24A
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 09:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 98.8
52% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 135
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1A46 1421) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.57 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$60
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 107 113 138 131 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 360
Write 314
Mixed 148
SusWrite 141
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 5.6
38% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 23.9
DQ Mixed 7
9% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 5.3
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14MB24A Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Vestel 14MB24A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback