Asus B250M-DRAGON

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B250M-DRAGON  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 08:00
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 408
55% 410 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3E56) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.22
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 8.3
6% 6.9 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2.5" 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0324A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 340 349 345 310 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 420
Write 340
Mixed 270
SusWrite 291
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 15
105% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 85.3
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 23.6
70% 142 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 78%
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H 500GB
417GB free
Firmware: HDFD2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 93.3
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 94.7
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU88N26-GIIHA0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 12
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250M-DRAGON Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B250M-DRAGON

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback