Lenovo 10M2S0SF0L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10M2S0SF0L  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30FD
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 03:56
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-9800E R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 112
41% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 175
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 30FD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 9.9
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 5.4
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0V23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 587 785 752 748 206 443 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 1,283
Write 818
Mixed 814
SusWrite 587
195% 875 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 31.5
77% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 344
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 128%
Great: 187%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
459GB free
Firmware: 0004LIM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 141 140 141 143 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 139
Write 130
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 139
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.5% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.9
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10M2S0SF0L Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10M2S0SF0L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback