Lenovo 10M2S0SF0L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10M2S0SF0L  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30FD
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 10:02
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-9800E R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 107
47% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 164
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 30FD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 9.9
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 5.7
5% 6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0V23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 537 746 369 304 219 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1167
Write 880
Mixed 767
SusWrite 398
179% 803 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 38.4
124% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 332
246% 326 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 124%
Great: 187%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0004LIM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 138 137 139 143 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 140
Write 122
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 138
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 77%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
19GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.1 9.9 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 9.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 10
18% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.6
155% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.7
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10M2S0SF0L Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10M2S0SF0L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback