TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alldocube i1405C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlldocube i1405C  (all builds)
MotherboardALLDOCUBE ALLDOCUBE
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 21:44
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 150
52% 93 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 227
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 50.6%
 Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 5.1
4% 5.5 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.44%
 Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S535N256GB 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0916A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 326 335 329 330 330 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.8% Very good
Read 402
Write 329
Mixed 330
SusWrite 320
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 17.2
83% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 39.6
86% 172 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 70.8%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.6% Above average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 22.1
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 51.6%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical i1405C Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Alldocube i1405C

CPU
Celeron N5100IntelBench 34%, 996 samples8x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples8x
SSD
S535N256GB 256GBBench 66%, 4 samples5x
TM8PS7001T 1TBTeamBench 75%, 2,755 samples2x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples1x
RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GBMicronBench 48%, 69 samples8x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback