Alldocube i1405C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlldocube i1405C  (all builds)
MotherboardALLDOCUBE ALLDOCUBE
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 18:15
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 32.3
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 109
34% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 193
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 5.4
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 7.9
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S535N256GB 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0916A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 286 276 305 386 369 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.5% Above average
Read 396
Write 200
Mixed 335
SusWrite 316
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 14.9
48% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 40.2
79% 156 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.1% Average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical i1405C Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Alldocube i1405C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback