Dell Inspiron 5537

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Inspiron 5537  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RKNTK
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 17:23
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 110
56% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 169
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05EA) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3325
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ts120gss TS12020S 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8T3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 162 80 111 91 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 361
Write 326
Mixed 305
SusWrite 93.9
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 26.5
119% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 172
130% 171 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
627GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 78 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 81.5
Write 81.3
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 77.9
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 5537 Builds (Compare 1,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 5537

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback