HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 15:20
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 187
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 549
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 64
Parallax 92
56% 74.8 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 48.9
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF512A5 SATA 512GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 55 44 50 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 397
Write 255
Mixed 301
SusWrite 53.6
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 18.3
70% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 99.4
DQ Mixed 113
97% 146 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 71%
MB2000GCWDA 2TB
117GB free
Firmware: HPGD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41% Average
Read 104
Write 36.2
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 38.2
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 41%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 23 22 22 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 19 17 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
377GB free
Firmware: A840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 94 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 62.9
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 92.9
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 82%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 152 137 134 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 171
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 151
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF25672PDZ1G4G 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback