| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-IDE (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131113 |
| Uptime | 4 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 22 '22 at 22:06 |
| Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
| Run User | HRV-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
60%
Good
|
63% 106 Pts
|
31% 232 Pts
|
14% 234 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.4%
Below average
|
31% 42.8 fps
|
29% 35.9 fps
| |
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0102) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.06%
Terrible
|
1% 1.03 fps
|
2% 2 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.1%
Average
|
49% 17 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
50% 79.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-IDE Builds (Compare 10 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-IDE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 3x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 2x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 1x |
| GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |