Lenovo 82FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82FX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2240 x 1400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 19:29
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 264
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 670
72% 570 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3802) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 27
Parallax 29.5
19% 26.6 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 20.8
22% 28.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GD9TNI-L2A0B 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11010C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 903 808 759 776 820 783 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,205
Write 1,646
Mixed 1,136
SusWrite 808
270% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 71.6
242% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 419
DQ Mixed 861
620% 820 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 208%
Great: 266%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D2NP-046 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 57.8
MC Mixed 38.8
129% 45 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 17.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82FX Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback