Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory46 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 10:20
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$220
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 139
2-Core 290
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 930
84% 707 Pts
64-Core 2,285
141% 2,285 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 36.9
19% 29.1 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 24.7
21% 25.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO 500GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3006 3115 3188 2634 1441 1439 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 2,898
Write 3,284
Mixed 2,964
SusWrite 2,470
656% 2,904 MB/s
4K Read 70.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 88.8
284% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,016
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 612
468% 653 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 386%
Great: 478%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
168GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1321 1077 1078 1078 1078 1082 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,464
Write 2,767
Mixed 1,267
SusWrite 1,119
426% 1,904 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 64.3
237% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 1,010
759% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 285%
Great: 442%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$54
167GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 1184 188 67 157 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,508
Write 1197
Mixed 1,258
SusWrite 493
249% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 77.8
263% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 901
DQ Write 952
DQ Mixed 802
637% 885 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 213%
Great: 239%
aigo U358 64GB
10GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 64 60 67 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.4% Below average
Read 137
Write 14.2
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 64.5
89% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 4.5
227% 6 MB/s
TOSHIBA EXT External 3.0 500GB
466GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 110
Write 109
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 111
121% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM4X16GC3200C16K2E CM4X16GD3200C16K2E CM4X16GC3200C16K2E CM4X16GD3200C16K2E 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 53.5
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 36.1
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 36.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 112%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $708
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback