Positivo Master D610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo Master D610  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIB150DT
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170915
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 23:01
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
Socket 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 626
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Device(1B0A 01BB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 8.1
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD HEORIADYHX-001 F 240G 240GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 106 69 19 110 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 472
Write 392
Mixed 345
SusWrite 92.7
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 26.7
136% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 41.5
82% 162 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
70% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Master D610 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo Master D610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $106
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback