Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 21:12
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$219
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 79.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 970
91% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,459
90% 1,459 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 124
Parallax 161
90% 132 fps
MRender 97.1
Gravity 113
Splatting 83.1
79% 97.8 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1161 1158 892 84 135 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,946
Write 1,113
Mixed 873
SusWrite 581
250% 1,128 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 53.8
208% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 370
316% 445 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 198%
Great: 278%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
387GB free
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1188 1194 1155 1097 1112 1070 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 1,178
Mixed 1,207
SusWrite 1136
277% 1,230 MB/s
4K Read 72.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 89.7
313% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,481
DQ Write 1,203
DQ Mixed 1,321
995% 1335 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 282%
Great: 573%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
600GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 77.1
Write 77.9
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 89.8
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 191 190 191 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 170
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 190
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Innostor Ext. HDD 2TB
412GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 107
Write 80.4
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 76
106% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 67%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSXP 500GB
95GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 37 35 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 28.9
Mixed 18
SusWrite 35.5
38% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 17%
Freecom ToughDrive 500GB
126GB free, PID fc9b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 37
Write 27.7
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 38.5
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 35.9
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback