Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '22 at 01:50
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119 14,368 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 83.3 1-Core 161 2-Core 295 98% 180 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 591 68% 531 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5500-$160 2,841 User benchmarks, average bench 50% HP(103C 86DE) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.1 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.9% Average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 63.4 Parallax 91.7 52% 73.1 fps	MRender 52.3 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 39 42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 792GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 120 129 145 161 163 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 148 Write 148 Mixed 93.7 SusWrite 138 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 513GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 145 135 150 157 157 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 156 Write 151 Mixed 95.3 SusWrite 147 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 109%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 120 111 121 127 128 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 125 Write 108 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 120 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 87%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 755GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 97 106 113 113 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 100 Write 98 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 105 70% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 77%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 787GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 159 176 185 185 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 176 Mixed 106 SusWrite 174 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB 1,518 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 232GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 16 20 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 36.3 Write 22.3 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 20.1 33% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.5 124% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 252GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 228GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 13 17 19 19 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 155 Write 17.6 Mixed 29 SusWrite 16.7 51% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2 132% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 31%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB 1,980 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free, PID 25fc Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 80 86 90 88 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 86.6 Write 86.9 Mixed 51.1 SusWrite 84.8 104% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
OLOy CL16-20-20 D4-3200 4x8GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 49.2 MC Write 43.4 MC Mixed 38 124% 43.5 GB/s	SC Read 30.9 SC Write 42.5 SC Mixed 35.3 104% 36.2 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,343x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,059x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	885x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	511x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	402x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	362x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	385x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	207x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	159x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	125x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	117x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,166

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16