Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 01:50
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 161
2-Core 295
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 591
68% 531 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-$160
HP(103C 86DE) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 91.7
52% 73.1 fps
MRender 52.3
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 39
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$18
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 120 129 145 161 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 148
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 138
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$18
513GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 145 135 150 157 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 156
Write 151
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 147
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87%
Great: 109%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 120 111 121 127 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 108
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 120
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 87%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
755GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 97 106 113 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 98
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 105
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$18
787GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 159 176 185 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 176
Mixed 106
SusWrite 174
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
232GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 16 20 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 22.3
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 20.1
33% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.5
124% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 252GB
228GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 13 17 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 155
Write 17.6
Mixed 29
SusWrite 16.7
51% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2
132% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 31%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
1TB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 80 86 90 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 86.6
Write 86.9
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 84.8
104% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOy CL16-20-20 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 49.2
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 38
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 35.3
104% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback