Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210320
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '22 at 18:57
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Memory 84.6 1-Core 146 2-Core 291 94% 174 Pts	4-Core 578 8-Core 1,123 101% 850 Pts	64-Core 2,189 136% 2,189 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.2 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.6% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 144 Parallax 190 100% 152 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 131 Splatting 97.3 93% 115 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 84 73 52 71 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 458 Write 133 Mixed 128 SusWrite 72.7 43% 198 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 26.1 105% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 67.2 80% 142 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 128%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 89GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 401 94 191 142 119 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.3% Good	Read 161 Write 103 Mixed 116 SusWrite 222 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 31.5 122% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 110 103% 158 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 212GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 72.9 Write 65 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 45.6 45% 60.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 57%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 655GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 79 80 79 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 79.6 Write 68.9 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 79.1 52% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 51%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB 9,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 740GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 176 171 171 175 170 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 291GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 95 94 95 95 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 78.5 Write 77.3 Mixed 47.4 SusWrite 94.7 101% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 61%
Seagate External Drive 250GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 176GB free, PID 0503 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7 7.1 7 7.2 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 34.6 Write 30.5 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 7 31% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB 11,505 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	MC Read 49.5 MC Write 44.5 MC Mixed 43.9 131% 46 GB/s	SC Read 28.5 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 40.2 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 32: 5R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
32%	7%	113	275	156	240	27"	2560 1440	AOC2730 AG273QS8R4

History: Score 13: 1R 1G 5B | Score 32: 5R 2G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $21

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,672x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $170Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,308x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,435x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,254x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,086x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,474x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,846x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	775x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	730x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $854

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16