Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 04:26
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 905
84% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,314
81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
MSI(1462 2061) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 1.1
0% 0.57 fps
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA72H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 783 633 629 633 633 627 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,078
Write 1,884
Mixed 1,353
SusWrite 656
333% 1,493 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 69.5
261% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 1,246
DQ Write 919
DQ Mixed 1,042
790% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 251%
Great: 295%
Intel Raid 10 Volume 487GB
452GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 944 529 126 156 198 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,161
Write 946
Mixed 816
SusWrite 344
182% 817 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 24.7
94% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,071
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 868
661% 900 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 137%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 13
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 11
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback