Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive483% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 01:37
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 176
2-Core 348
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,351
120% 1,018 Pts
64-Core 2,880
178% 2,880 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 115
Parallax 105
90% 110 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 105
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2580 3397 3378 3423 3398 3002 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
483% Outstanding
Read 2,800
Write 3,385
Mixed 3,084
SusWrite 3,196
706% 3,116 MB/s
4K Read 79.5
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 116
378% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,465
DQ Write 1,137
DQ Mixed 1,282
964% 1,295 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 483%
Great: 508%
Amd-raid Array 2 20TB
15.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 232 228 221 220 225 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
Read 298
Write 387
Mixed 195
SusWrite 225
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 1.5
20% 6.53 MB/s
DQ Read 5.4
DQ Write 8.4
DQ Mixed 5.1
4% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 256%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 208 202 200 196 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 425
Write 420
Mixed 338
SusWrite 202
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 36.9
125% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 123
100% 139 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 134%
Amd-raid Array 3 1TB
487GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 228 224 223 220 222 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 463
Write 163
Mixed 230
SusWrite 225
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 39.3
128% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 111
92% 129 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 332%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 208 206 202 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 200
Mixed 207
SusWrite 207
280% 203 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.1
387% 6.97 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 7.2
DQ Mixed 1.4
297% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 1.5TB
467GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 38 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 38.1
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 36.4
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 63.2
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 35.3
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 38
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 125%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback