Monster TULPAR T7 V18.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V18.3  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook TULPAR T7 V18.3
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 19:33
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 290
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 882
83% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,432
89% 1,432 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7710) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 164
Parallax 158
121% 157 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 136
Splatting 123
119% 149 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$57
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1703 1021 1357 981 509 520 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,625
Write 1,736
Mixed 1,471
SusWrite 1,015
381% 1,712 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 72.1
258% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,140
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 486
498% 817 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 290%
Great: 311%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
148GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 105 104 107 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48% Average
Read 61.7
Write 82.9
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 105
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 27.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 25.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V18.3 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V18.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback