Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory	56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180628
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '22 at 15:12
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 196 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 602 61% 497 Pts	64-Core 708 44% 708 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (88^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)	53.7% Above average	Lighting 66.3 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 61.5 54% 65.1 fps	MRender 66.8 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 62.4 53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Innovation IT 512GB 654 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 389 394 390 381 378 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 433 Write 367 Mixed 350 SusWrite 386 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 17.2 98% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 23.5 76% 158 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 95%
Intenso SATAIII 1TB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 895GB free Firmware: 9A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 235 233 232 228 229 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.3% Above average	Read 247 Write 222 Mixed 222 SusWrite 233 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 25.6 92% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 40.4 61% 116 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 222GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 235 234 232 229 229 MB/s Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64% Good	Read 242 Write 223 Mixed 221 SusWrite 234 52% 230 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 23.7 111% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 46.2 64% 117 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 100%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$88 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 887GB free Firmware: 0A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 151 151 151 149 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 152 Write 131 Mixed 103 SusWrite 150 99% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR8C HMT41GR7BFR8C HMT41GR7AFR8C HMT41GV7BFR8A HMT41GR7AFR8C HMT41GV7BFR8A HMT41GR7AFR8C Sem... 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	99.8% Outstanding	MC Read 41.8 MC Write 38.7 MC Mixed 38.3 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M730power Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	7x
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	6x
Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	5x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
840 Pro 512GBSamsung $129Bench 96%, 14,996 samples	5x
SATAIII 1TBIntensoBench 76%, 294 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
HMT31GR7EFR4C 4x8GBHynixBench 101%, 53 samples	4x
HMT42GR7AFR4C 8x16GBHynixBench 98%, 29 samples	2x
HMT31GR7EFR4C 8x8GBHynixBench 106%, 28 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $1,204

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16