Acer Veriton S6620G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton S6620G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton S6620G
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 202
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 485
54% 424 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 36.7
27% 35 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 23.6
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
861GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH450400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 153 197 203 129 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 410
Write 375
Mixed 303
SusWrite 172
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 14.2
63% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 33.3
44% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 106%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
42GB free
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 404 439 446 324 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 406
Write 432
Mixed 370
SusWrite 320
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 31.5
109% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 194
174% 260 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.C1GET.AU10C 78.C1GET.AU10C Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 18.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton S6620G Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Acer Veriton S6620G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback