HP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843F
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 02:43
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,092
97% 821 Pts
64-Core 1,075
66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 48.1
Parallax 34.8
30% 39.8 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 28.4
28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,095
Write 961
Mixed 944
223% 1,000 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 75.1
244% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 1,028
DQ Mixed 1144
840% 1,098 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
426GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 178 178 181 178 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 173
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 176
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
230GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 42 41 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 35.9
Write 31.9
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 39.5
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
160% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27%
Great: 66%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
3TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 36 36 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 33.4
Write 33.9
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 35.1
44% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 8502 PSD416G24002 32GB
2133, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.9% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 21.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx Builds (Compare 539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $110
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback