HP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843F
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 01:51
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 475
41% 350 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 35.2
30% 40 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 28.7
28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 871 752 419 389 357 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,002
Write 838
Mixed 854
SusWrite 598
185% 823 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 67.5
234% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 843
632% 849 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 187%
Great: 355%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
426GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 179 177 173 169 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 169
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 173
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
230GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 40 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 35
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 36.2
46% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 66%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
3TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 38 37 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 36
Write 36
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 36.7
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 8502 PSD416G24002 32GB
2133, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.9% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 24.4
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx Builds (Compare 539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $110
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback