MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101210
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 20:23
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 80.5
42% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 81.5
8-Core 76.8
11% 79.2 Pts
64-Core 79.4
5% 79.4 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
MSI(1462 2630) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 0.3
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 57 62 60 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 161
Write 105
Mixed 111
SusWrite 58.4
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 12.4
49% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 27.6
DQ Mixed 18.8
15% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 26%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
650GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 62 63 63 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 63.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 62.1
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD32G133381 Kingston 99U5474-001.A00LF PSD32G133381 Kingston 99U5474-001.A00LF 6GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 770-C45 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 770-C45 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $621
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback