HP 810-311nl

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 810-311nl  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 16:12
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 206
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 578
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 38.8
30% 39.2 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 28
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 65 75 49 5.8 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 500
Write 430
Mixed 11
SusWrite 83.3
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.4
44% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 92%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB
231GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 80 81 81 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 78.2
Write 46.4
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 78
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-311nl Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 810-311nl

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback