Asrock H61M-VS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110621
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 15:40
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 89.8
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 121
61% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 206
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 364.96
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 39
Parallax 35.3
32% 37.7 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 30.2
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 108 111 116 121 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 158
Write 146
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 118
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 104%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
217GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 61 60 62 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 62.4
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 60.7
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
144GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 0.3
0% 0.23 MB/s
4K Write 0.3
17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
160GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 93 94 93 94 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 90.9
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 93.9
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 1078 2TB
757GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 22.7
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 11.6
26% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 43%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
201GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 3.2
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 11.5
18% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 47%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
315GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 12 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 28
Write 24.9
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 11.6
27% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback