Lenovo 20KSA017CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20KSA017CD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20KSA017CD
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180829
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 04:33
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 146
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 211
31% 225 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5069) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 0.2
5% 8.2 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.3
5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 99 2 3.4 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31% Below average
Read 401
Write 246
Mixed 271
SusWrite 51.6
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 11.9
33% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 34.9
DQ Mixed 18.6
17% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.8% Above average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 19.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20KSA017CD Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20KSA017CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback