Lenovo 20ARS0C100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20ARS0C100  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ARS0C100
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '17 at 17:27
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 140
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 205
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 6.38
3% 5.45 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.39
5% 5.65 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AL6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 496
Write 200
Mixed 267
70% 321 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 13
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 79.4
DQ Mixed 12.2
21% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 91%
SAMSUNG MZ7TD256HAFV-000 256GB
195GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 35
Write 36.1
Mixed 35.7
46% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.43
4K Write 8.48
4K Mixed 5.29
496% 7.07 MB/s
DQ Read 9.29
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 5.66
610% 8.74 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 396%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT851S6AMR6A-PB Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 18.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback