HP ZBook 15 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 15 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80D5
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 20:36
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 158
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 394
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80D5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 5.7
4% 9.47 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.7
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
HP(103C 80D5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.08
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.5
16% 19 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 22
Splatting 15.9
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KF512G8 512GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 280 293 299 293 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 391
Write 249
Mixed 311
SusWrite 282
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 32.1
107% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 219
182% 263 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 123%
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GB
45GB free
Firmware: EMT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 156 156 156 157 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 417
Write 104
Mixed 179
SusWrite 151
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 26.2
105% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 183
155% 231 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 G3 Builds (Compare 2,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback