Gigabyte GA-MZBSWMP-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGIGABYTE GB-BACE-3160
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZBSWMP-00  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 18:20
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3160
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 41.8
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 41.7
23% 34.7 Pts
4-Core 81
8-Core 81.5
11% 81.2 Pts
64-Core 82.6
5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 71 71 71 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 386
Write 268
Mixed 284
SusWrite 112
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 23.8
90% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 159
122% 167 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.1 7.2 14 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 145
Write 37.3
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 11.6
78% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
129% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-145.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 5.9
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MZBSWMP-00 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZBSWMP-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback