Lenovo 20H5006FAD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20H5006FAD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20H5006FAD
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 08:33
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 156
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 231
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 505C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4727
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 6
5% 7.87 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 191 297 140 90 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 386
Write 304
Mixed 316
SusWrite 161
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 10.2
65% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 50.6
92% 175 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-097.A00G 9905711-035.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.1% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 14.1
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20H5006FAD Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20H5006FAD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback