Zspace 0002

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZspace 0002  (all builds)
MotherboardzSpace zSpace-AIO
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 19:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7300-$97
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 196
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 323
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
Device(1D4E 0002) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.Q4
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 19.5
10% 18.7 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 20.5
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASS-120 120GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 375 372 268 109 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.9% Outstanding
Read 385
Write 419
Mixed 349
SusWrite 272
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 42
170% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 96.1
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 129
115% 166 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7S8MA-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 0002 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Zspace 0002

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback