Alienware 14

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware 14  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07MJ2Y
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 14:33
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 186
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 493
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05A9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6
2% 3.83 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.5
3% 4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LMH-128V2M-11 MSATA 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FM7110C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 128 128 126 127 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 452
Write 175
Mixed 150
SusWrite 122
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 33.4
113% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 172
145% 215 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
421GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 85 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 79.6
Write 80.2
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 83.8
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX16GX3M2C1866C1 Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 12GB
1777, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 6.7
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 4.6
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14 Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback