Dell Latitude E7440

Performance Results

Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E7440  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150202
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 03:35
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.8% Poor
Memory 39.6
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 47.5
28% 41.5 Pts
4-Core 59.9
8-Core 56.2
8% 58.1 Pts
64-Core 58.3
4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 0.73
Parallax 1.03
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 1.48
0% 1.01 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon LMH-128V2M-11 MSATA 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FM7110A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 79 72 60 60 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 407
Write 146
Mixed 129
SusWrite 71.1
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 21.9
69% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 93.5
DQ Mixed 83.9
66% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Latitude E7440 Builds (Compare 3,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 53%
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7440

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback