Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-DS2V  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 13:16
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 190
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 269
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 138 137 238 146 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31% Below average
Read 175
Write 88.2
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 174
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 10.2
42% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
431GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 72.2
Write 69.8
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 75.9
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-DS2V Builds (Compare 720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2V - $51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback