Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-DS2V  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 12:02
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 269
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 137 137 207 137 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 200
Write 85.8
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 158
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 10.1
41% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
431GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 76 74 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 68.8
Write 70.4
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 74.5
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-DS2V Builds (Compare 718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2V - $51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback