Gigabyte GA-880GA-UD3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-880GA-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 21:18
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 101
51% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 286
30% 241 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Device(0000 0000) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 63.2
55% 66.3 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 63.8
54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 171 52 169 158 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 475
Write 358
Mixed 301
SusWrite 160
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 19
74% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 21.5
25% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
555GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 104 103 102 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 94.2
Mixed 74
SusWrite 102
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26
162GB free
Firmware: ST2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 95 94 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 55.5
Write 53
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 94.6
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 8.7
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-880GA-UD3H Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GA-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback