Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 20:10
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 694
71% 573 Pts
64-Core 1,105
68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Gigabyte(1458 40A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 255
Parallax 268
229% 268 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 230
Splatting 178
198% 253 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 195%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 804 650 651 652 670 672 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,556
Write 699
Mixed 1,527
SusWrite 683
301% 1,366 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 82.1
269% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 744
566% 766 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 262%
Great: 340%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
845GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 234 160 162 161 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 190
Mixed 431
SusWrite 248
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 51.7
171% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 366
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
398GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 354 435 485 450 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 136
Mixed 316
SusWrite 446
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 53.7
179% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
287GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 164 160 160 159 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 407
Mixed 396
SusWrite 211
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 47.9
161% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 367
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 122%
LaCie Rugged THB USB3 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1075
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 113 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 112
Write 83.2
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 112
125% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 34.1
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,006
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback